Template:About Ceph
Ceph Cluster
A Ceph Cluster is a group of three or more systems that have been clustered together using the Ceph storage technology. Ceph requires a minimum of three nodes to create a cluster so that quorum may be established across the Ceph Monitors. Wikipedia Quorum (distributed computing).
In QuantaStor based Ceph configurations, QuantaStor systems must first be combined into a Storage Grid. After the Storage Grid is formed one more more Ceph Clusters may be created within the Storage Grid. In the example above the Storage Grid is comprised of a single Ceph Cluster. When the Ceph Cluster is initially created QuantaStor automatically deploys 3x Ceph Monitors within the new Ceph Cluster.
Ceph Monitor
The Ceph Monitors form a Paxos The Part-Time Parliament cluster for the management of cluster membership, configuration information, and state. Paxos is an algorithm (developed by Leslie Lamport in the late 80s) which uses a three-phase consensus protocol to ensure that cluster updates can be done in a fault-tolerant timely fashion even in the event of a node outage or node that is acting improperly. Ceph uses the algorithm so that the membership, configuration and state information is updated safely across the cluster in an efficient manner. Since the algorithm requires a quorum of nodes to agree on any given change an odd number of systems (three or more) are required for any given Ceph cluster deployment.
During initial Ceph cluster creation, QuantaStor will configure the first three systems to have active Ceph Monitor services. Configurations with more than 16 nodes should add two additional monitors. This can be done through the QuantaStor web user interface in the Scale-out Storage Configuration section.
In a Ceph cluster with 3x monitors a minimum of 2x monitors must be online at all times. If only one monitor (or none) are running then storage access will is automatically disabled until quorum among monitors may be reestablished. In larger clusters with 5x monitors then 3x monitors must be online at all times to maintain quorum and storage accessibility.
Ceph Object Storage Daemon / OSD
The Ceph Object Storage Daemon, known as the OSD, is a daemon process that reads and writes data and generally maps 1-to-1 to a HDD or a SSD device. OSD devices may be used by multiple Storage Pools so after the OSDs are added one my allocate pools for file, block, and object storage which all use the available OSDs in the cluster to store their data.
QuantaStor Scale-out SAN with Ceph deployments must have at least 3x OSDs per system, making 9x OSDs total the minimum number OSDs. QuantaStor 5 and newer versions use the BlueStore OSD storage back-end. For additional BlueStore information see, New in Luminous: BlueStore.
Journal Groups
Journal Groups are used to boost the performance of OSDs. Each Journal Group can provide a performance boost for 5x to 30x OSD devices depending on the speed of the storage media used to create a given Journal Group. Journal Groups are typically created using a pair of SSDs which QuantaStor combines into software RAID1 mirror. Once created Journal Groups provide high performance, low latency, storage from which Ceph Journal Devices may be provisioned and attached to new OSDs to boost performance. Because Journal Groups must sustain high write loads over a period of years only datacenter (DC) grade / enterprise grade flash media should be used to create them. Journal Groups can be created using all types of flash storage media including NVMe, PMEM, SATA SSD, or SAS SSD.
Journal Devices are provisioned from Journal Groups. Journal Devices come in two types, Write-Ahead-Log (WAL) devices and Meta-data DB (MDB) devices. QuantaStor automatically provisions WAL devices to be 2GB in size and MDB devices can be 3GB, 30GB (default), or 300GB in size.
Journal Groups are not required but are highly recommended when creating HDD based OSDs. With SSD based OSDs it is not recommended to assign them external WAL and MDB devices from Journal Groups. Rather the MDB and WAL storage for SSDs will be allocated out of a small portion of the underlying OSD data device. With platter/HDD based OSDs we highly recommend the creation of Journal Groups so that each OSD can have both an external WAL device and a external MDB device.
NVMe and 3D XPoint flash storage media are the best storage types for creating Journal Groups due to their high throughput and IOPS performance. We recommend allocating 100MB/sec and 32GB of capacity for each HDD based OSD. For example, a system with 60x HDD based OSDs would require 60x100MB/sec or 6000MB/sec of Journal Group throughput. If NVMe devices are selected that can do 2000MB/sec then three Journal Groups will be required and a total of 6x NVMe SSDs (3x RAID1 Journal Groups). Capacity wise 60x HDDs will require 60x32GB of storage for all the WAL and MDB devices to be created or what amounts to 1.92TB of provisionable Journal Group capacity. One possible design to meet both the performance and the capacity requirements would be to make the 3x Journal Groups using a total of 6x 800GB NVMe devices with a 3x DWPD endurance.
Write-Ahead Log (WAL) Journal Devices
WAL Journal Devices are provisioned from Journal Groups and are then attached to new OSDs when they are created. WAL devices accelerate write performance. When a write request is received by an OSD it is able to write the data to low-latency stable flash media very quickly to complete the write. Data can then be written lazily to the HDD as time allows without risk of losing data due to a sudden system power outage.
Meta-data Database (MDB) Journal Devices
MDB Journal Devices effectively boost both read and write performance as they contain all the Bluestore filesystem metadata. Rather than having to write small blocks of metadata to HDDs which have low IOPS performance and external MDB device on flash media can sustain high IOPS loads and in turn greatly boosts performance.
Hardware RAID
Although Hardware RAID can be used in Ceph Clusters it is generally not recommended. It does have applications in very large Ceph clusters (ie. 1000s of OSDs) and with clusters comprised of servers with limited RAM and CPU core count. Roughly speaking each OSD requires approximately 2GB of RAM and a 1GHz fractional CPU core. A server with 60x HDD based OSDs will require a large dual-processor configuration and 192GB of RAM. By combining disks using HW RAID these requirements are reduced 5:1. QuantaStor does have integrated hardware RAID management and monitoring to manage configurations that use hardware RAID. But again, we do not recommend the use of HW RAID except in specialized configurations and in hyper-scale configurations.
Placement Group / PG
Ceph uses Placement Groups, PGs, to implement mirroring (or erasure coding) of data across OSDs according to the configured replica count for a given Ceph Pool.
The user specifies how many copies of the data must be maintained by the Ceph Pool during creation to ensure a level of high-availability and fault-tolerance, usually 2 copies when using hardware RAID or 3 copies when no disk-level RAID is present. Ceph in turn creates a series of Placement Groups as directed by QuantaStor to be associated with the Ceph Pool.
One way to think of the placement groups is as logical mini-mirrors in a RAID10 configuration. Each placement group is either a two-way, three-way or 4-way mirror across 2, 3, or 4 OSDs respectively. Because the number of OSDs will grow over the life of the cluster, QuantaStor allocates a large number of PGs for each Ceph Pool to evenly distribute data across the OSDs and accommodate future expansion as OSDs are added. In this way Ceph can very efficiently re-organize and re-balance PGs to mirror across new OSDs as they are added.
The PG count stays fixed as OSDs are added but a maintenance command can be run to increase the PG count for a Ceph Pool if the PG count gets low relative to the number of OSDs in the Pool. In general the PG count should be roughly 10x to 100x higher than the OSD count for a given Ceph Pool.
Similar to RAID10 technology, a PG can become degraded if one or more copies is offline. Ceph is designed to keep running in a degraded state when copies are lost, so whole systems can go offline without any disruption to clients accessing the cluster. Ceph also automatically repairs and updates the offline PGs once the offline OSDs come back online online and if the offline system doesn't come back online in a reasonable amount of time the cluster will auto heal itself by adjusting the PGs, swapping out the offline OSDs with good online OSDs. In this way a cluster will automatically heal a Ceph Pool back to 100% automatically (ie, return to full/complete copy count).
Also, if an OSD is explicitly removed, the PGs referencing it are re-balanced and re-organized across the remaining OSDs to recover the system back to 100% health on the remaining OSDs.
Ceph CRUSH Maps and Resource Domains
Ceph supports the ability to organize placement groups, which provide data mirroring across OSDs, so that high-availability and fault-tolerance can be maintained even in the event of a rack or site outage. By defining failure-domains, such as a Rack of systems, a Site, or Building, a map can be created so that Placement Groups are intelligently laid out to ensure high-availability despite the outage of one or more failure-domains, depending on the level of redundancy.
This intelligent map is called the Ceph CRUSH map, standing for Controlled, Scalable, Decentralized Placement of Replicated Data, and it defines how to mirror data in the Ceph cluster to ensure optimal performance and availability.
Creating CRUSH maps manually can be a complex process, so QuantaStor creates and configures CRUSH maps automatically, saving a large degree of administrative overhead. To facilitate automatic CRUSH map management, detail regarding where each QuantaStor system is deployed must be provided. This is done by creating a tree of Resource Domains via the WebUI (or via CLI/REST APIs) to organize the systems in a given QuantaStor Grid into Racks, Sites, and Buildings. QuantaStor uses this information to automatically generate an optimal CRUSH map when pools are provisioned, ensuring optimal performance and high-availability.
Custom CRUSH map changes can still be made to adjust the map after the pool(s) are created and OSNEXUS provides consulting services to meet special requirements. Resource Domains are a QuantaStor construct so you will not find mention of them in general Ceph documentation, but they map closely to the CRUSH bucket hierarchy.
For additional information see, CRUSH MAPS